While the IOSCO Principles do not preclude the use of expert judgment, it has been questioned whether a rate on which hundreds of trillions of dollars of contracts are based should rely on such judgment except in the most exigent circumstances. Ongoing regulatory reforms and changing market structures raise questions about whether unsecured short-term borrowing transactions may become even scarcer in the future, particularly in periods of stress, which exacerbates these concerns.
Absent regulatory encouragement or mandate, banks may feel little incentive to contribute to USD LIBOR panels if transaction volumes erode further given the potential legal risks that have been associated with historical contributions and the lack of any direct benefits from panel participation.
The threat of a sudden cessation of such a heavily used reference rate poses particular risks. Importantly, these disruptions would be substantially greater if there were no viable alternative to USD LIBOR that market participants could quickly move to. Are we at risk of creating a third reference rate for swaps that will decrease liquidity in the other products without achieving widespread adoption?
Successful implementation will obviously require support and participation from a broad set of market participants. This effort would certainly entail costs, but continued reliance on USD LIBOR on the current scale of use could entail much higher costs in the event that unsecured short-term borrowing declined further and submitting banks chose to leave the LIBOR panels, especially if there were no viable alternative to which trading could move.
If ARRC members, the official sector, and end users all continue to participate in and support finalizing these plans, then a transition can successfully be made with the least disruption to the market as a fairly smooth process, with minimal risk that the adoption of the new rate will fail while liquidity in current existing products is decreased.
Will the ARRC coordinate its decisions with the other currency groups? The ARRC has kept in close contact with other currency groups, and will to the extent possible, seek to coordinate its efforts and proposals with them. However, institutional differences across markets may ultimately lead some currency groups to make different choices than others, and a higher level of bases across currencies could prove to be unavoidable. Is there a plan to run an industry netting of OIS risk as well as the new benchmark?
As discussed in the Interim Report, mechanisms for closing out legacy contracts will need to be devised in order to both meet likely market demand and ensure the safety and soundness of the CCPs in case of a member default involving a significant legacy book.
Some ARRC members have also expressed interest in exploring mechanisms to accelerate the closing of legacy contracts, but no details have yet been discussed within the ARRC, and the feasibility of mechanisms of this nature would depend on individual capabilities and interests. Robust basis markets between the new rate and both LIBOR and the EFFR would also help to facilitate the voluntary closing of legacy contracts and will help to smooth the transition process.
The ARRC will continue its planning for these types of mechanisms and for building basis markets. Would they still be quoted and would there be liquidity? Would they be able to be re-couponed based on new benchmark curve? As discussed in the Interim Report, under the paced transition plan cleared legacy trades would continue to exist in the same pool under their current contractual terms until such time as they mature or are closed out.
In addition, mechanisms for closing out legacy contracts will need to be devised in order to meet likely market demand and to ensure the safety and soundness of CCPs in case of a the default of a member with a significant legacy book, and methods for accelerating close out may also be considered by the ARRC.
Will CCPs be able to provide daily valuation for these new curves? Implementation of this step and subsequent trading would then allow CCPs and other market participants to build daily valuations for these new curves.
Why is discounting using the new rate not being implemented contemporaneously with the trading of new-rate swaps?
Is there any perceived benefit to having the first new-rate swap trade be discounted using OIS referencing the effective federal funds rate? The timing of a move to discounting using the new rate will depend on several conditions. The ability to discount using a curve based on the new rate will depend on first establishing liquidity in swaps and futures markets referencing the rate, enabling CCPs and other market participants to model and establish daily valuations for these curves.
The willingness of CCPs and other market participants to use the new rate as the discount rate to value swaps referencing the new rate or other rates will then depend further on the rules and procedures set out by each institution and will depend crucially on the perceived market demand for such a change and on the understanding that the new discount curve accurately reflects market pricing. As discussed above, the willingness of CCPs and other market participants to use the new discount rate to value swaps referencing the new rate or other rates will then depend further on the rules and procedures set out by each CCP and will depend crucially on the perceived market demand for such a change and on the understanding that the new discount curve accurately reflects market pricing.
At such time that a CCP decides to move discounting to the new rate exclusively, then all swap products would be valued at the new discount curve, including legacy trades. If swaps referencing the new rate are not clearable on day one of trading, is it possible to obtain regulatory exemption from bilateral margining rules? Your trusted data source since Account Tools. Federal funds rate published in The Wall Street Journal.
FRED Graph. FRED Blog. Interested in Interest Rates? Federal Funds Effective Rate. Bank Prime Loan Rate. Are you sure you want to remove this series from the graph? This can not be undone. Cancel Remove.
Save graph Save as new graph. Need Help? It might borrow reserves in the federal funds market, or it might sell securities "under repo. Because there are only minor differences in the quality of the two assets, their rates remain very closely tied together due to the elimination of arbitrage opportunities that would otherwise exist for banks who participate in both markets.
Similarly, other short-term money market interest rates respond in kind in order to maintain a portfolio balance under which all assets yield the same expected return after adjusting for risk, maturity, and liquidity differences.
Hence, when the Fed adjusts its target for the federal funds rate, all other short-term interest rates tend to move with it. Indeed, some short-term interest rates may change in anticipation of the change in the target. Although the relation between the FOMC's setting of the federal funds rate and the more economically relevant long-term yields is hardly direct or mechanical, a critical connection does exist. The connection operates less through the current value of the funds rate, however, than through the interest-rate actions that the FOMC is expected to take in the future.
Specifically, financial theorists and market practitioners concur that, with risk and term premiums held constant, long-term yields move closely with the expectations that financial-market participants hold about the future evolution of the funds rate and other related short-term rates. For example, all else being equal, if short-term rates are expected to be high on average over the relevant period, then longer-term yields will tend to be high as well.
Were that not the case, investors would profit by holding a sequence of short-term securities and declining to hold long-term bonds, an outcome inconsistent with the requirement that, in equilibrium, all securities must be willingly held.
Likewise, if future short-term rates are expected to be low on average, then long-term bond yields will tend to be low as well. Skip to content Readability Tools. Reader View.
0コメント